200-799
Standard duty
Procedures to reduce physical harm in an attack and move people to safety. Procedural, not structural — but they must be real, understood by staff, and recorded.
Protective Security Consultancy
Martyn’s Law readiness for UK operators. We establish your position, close the gaps, and leave a record that withstands examination. The duty remains with the Responsible Person. The evidence supporting it is our work.
Routes · Exits · Occupancy · Evidence
01 — The issue
Arrangements exist in almost every premises. Staff know what to do. Doors get locked, rooms get cleared, managers make the call.
What is rarely held is the record: which tier applies and on what basis, what was assessed, what was decided, and what the people on shift were actually told.
The Act is satisfied by what can be shown. Intention is not evidence.
02 — The position
The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025 places duties on the Responsible Person for qualifying premises and events. The applicable tier turns on the number of individuals who may reasonably be expected to be present at the same time.
Section 2 of the Act. Standard duty covers a wide band; the enhanced duty has no upper bound. Four Schedule 1 uses sit outside this scale entirely — see below.
200-799
Procedures to reduce physical harm in an attack and move people to safety. Procedural, not structural — but they must be real, understood by staff, and recorded.
800+
The standard duties, with measures to reduce vulnerability, a documented assessment, and a named individual accountable to the regulator.
Indicative only. Capacity bands indicate a position; they do not determine one. That assessment rests with the Responsible Person, against Home Office statutory guidance.
03 — The gap
Protective security fails for predictable reasons, and none of them is a failure of intent.
Each of these is inexpensive to correct. Left alone, each is the point at which a position stops being defensible.
04 — The method
Four stages, undertaken in sequence. Where the appropriate outcome is reached, the engagement concludes.
01
Determine whether the premises falls within the regime, the applicable tier and the Responsible Person, on the face of the Act.
02
Examine existing arrangements against the requirements of the applicable tier, considering the premises, its people and the distinction between what is documented and what is practised.
03
Develop the necessary procedures and measures, with clear ownership and timescales. Arrangements are written for the premises and the way it operates.
04
Record the assessment, decisions and reasoning in a form that can be readily evidenced when required. The position is reviewed and refreshed annually under retainer.
05 — The evidence
A report alone is not the objective. The objective is a clear evidential record of how the security position was established and the decisions that followed.
It establishes:
The record is specific to the premises and its operation. There are no pre-packaged assessments. Scope and fixed fee are agreed before work begins.
06 — Sector focus: Hospitality
Pubs, bars, nightclubs, hotels and resorts operate in an environment where occupancy changes, staffing rotates and experience varies from shift to shift.
Readiness therefore cannot exist only on paper. The arrangements must work in the hands of the people expected to act.
This is where our practice begins.
07 — Tool
Three questions, an indicative answer. No registration and nothing retained: the tool runs entirely in your browser, and nothing entered reaches this server.